Start here
Overview
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) helps agents answer with internal documents—if retrieval and governance are right.
Core concept
Definition
RAG connects prompts to curated document chunks with similarity search, then generates answers constrained to retrieved context—with citations where possible.
Business impact
Why it matters
Ungrounded models hallucinate policies; bad retrieval surfaces wrong snippets. Operations needs accuracy over fluency.
Practical model
Framework
Source governance
Authoritative docs only; versioned; expiry for time-sensitive policy.
Chunking strategy
Structure-aware splits for SOPs and tables—not naive fixed sizes.
Implementation detail
Detailed breakdown
Evaluation
Test sets from real questions; measure grounded vs ungrounded responses.
In practice
Real-world example
A manufacturer reduced incorrect repair steps by requiring citations to service bulletins before field instructions displayed.
Avoid these
Common mistakes
- Dumping PDFs without metadata—retrieval returns junk.
- No feedback when answers wrong—no improvement loop.
Engineering layer
Technical patterns
Chunk lineage
- `chunk_id → doc_version → storage_uri` for compliance takedowns.
- Re-embed only when embedding model or chunking policy changes.
Grounding response
- Answer must cite `chunk_id`; refuse if retrieval score below threshold.
Build patterns
Code examples
Citation-enforced answer stub
Caller merges LLM output with allowed chunk IDs only.
export function validateCitations(answer, allowedChunkIds) {
for (const c of answer.citations) {
if (!allowedChunkIds.has(c.chunkId)) throw new Error('invalid_citation');
}
return answer;
}System view
System architecture
[Document ingest]
→ [Chunk + embed pipeline]
→ [Vector index + BM25 index]
→ [Retriever + reranker]
→ [LLM with citation template]
→ [Cache + feedback]Keep learning
Related topics
Next step
PrimeAxiom builds grounded knowledge systems for ops—book a retrieval architecture session.