Start here
Overview
Security reviews should be proportional: risk-tiered controls for internal ops automation vs customer-facing agents.
Core concept
Definition
A practical AI security review examines data classification, model providers, prompt injection surfaces, tool permissions, secret storage, and incident response for automation failures.
Business impact
Why it matters
AI expands attack surface: tools can exfiltrate data if mis-scoped; prompts can be manipulated if user content is unconstrained.
Practical model
Framework
Data flow diagram
Where prompts and retrieved docs travel; where outputs land.
Least privilege
Separate service accounts per integration; rotate keys.
Implementation detail
Detailed breakdown
Red teaming prompts
Test jailbreaks specific to your templates and tools.
In practice
Real-world example
A healthcare vendor blocked external URLs in support chat inputs after tests showed credential phishing attempts via prompts.
Avoid these
Common mistakes
- Shared API keys across tenants.
- No rollback plan when a model provider has an incident.
Engineering layer
Technical patterns
Threat modeling for agents
- STRIDE on tool-calling paths: spoofed webhooks, tampered documents, over-privileged API keys.
- Separate network egress for model calls vs internal DB.
Build patterns
Code examples
Egress allowlist check
Outbound fetch restricted to approved domains.
const ALLOW = new Set(['api.openai.com', 'api.anthropic.com']);
export function assertAllowedUrl(url) {
const host = new URL(url).host;
if (!ALLOW.has(host)) throw new Error('egress_denied');
}System view
System architecture
[Architecture diagram + data flow]
→ [Classification]
→ [Control matrix: authZ, secrets, network]
→ [Residual risk + compensating controls]
→ [Sign-off artifacts]Keep learning
Related topics
Next step
PrimeAxiom aligns automation designs to your security requirements—book a joint review with your IT team.