Multi-Department Automation Roadmaps: A 90-Day Pattern

Start here

Overview

Ninety days is enough to prove value and learn integration reality—if scope is disciplined. This roadmap pattern sequences audit, pilot, hardening, and expansion.

Core concept

Definition

A 90-day roadmap aligns stakeholders on one measurable outcome per month, with explicit dependencies (CRM readiness, API access, training).

Business impact

Why it matters

Boiling-the-ocean roadmaps fail quietly. Time-boxed phases create accountability.

Practical model

Framework

Days 1–30

Discovery, baselines, and pilot scope locked; integrations proven in sandbox.

Days 31–60

Pilot live with monitoring; weekly iteration; exception playbooks.

Days 61–90

Hardening, adjacent step expansion, documentation and handover.

Implementation detail

Detailed breakdown

Cross-functional steering

Weekly checkpoint with RevOps, IT, and process owners.

In practice

Real-world example

A services company shipped lead response in 30 days, scheduling by 60, and AR handoff tasks by 90—each funding the next.

Avoid these

Common mistakes

Parallel projects without integration dependencies mapped.
No owner after go-live—automation orphan.

Engineering layer

Technical patterns

Wave planning

Wave 0: observability + identity; Wave 1: high-ROI rules; Wave 2: ML.
Critical path on shared platform work (events, CRM contract).

Build patterns

Code examples

Milestone dependency check

Simple DAG guard for status reporting.

TypeScript

export function canStartMilestone(done, required) {
  return required.every((id) => done.has(id));
}

System view

System architecture

YAML

[Discovery intake]
        → [Portfolio: value × feasibility]
        → [Sequenced waves with owners]
        → [Weekly telemetry review]
        → [Adjust scope by learnings]

Keep learning